Fire Department Safety Officer Week 3 - building construction Essay

Fire Department Safety Officer Week 3 - building construction - Essay Example Masonry comprise of brickwork and blockwork. Extreme heat causes masonry to expand and crack. However, this would take considerable time. Bricks are toughened by conflagration, and therefore, are able to withstand fire longer. Concrete is often toughened with steel. If the reinforcement is superficial, the extension of the steel causes the concrete to expand. The expansion causes fissures. Timber is the adversely affected by conflagration. The ignition point of timber is lower than other elements. Exposure to heat and oxygen results in incineration. Combustion starts with the charring of the surface, and thereafter, the structural integrity is compromised. Prolonged fire burns the timber to ashes. Metal is extensively affected by fire. Heat elevates the kinetic energy of the atomic configuration of the metal. The structure weakens and looses strength. At 500 degrees, it may loose 50% of its strength. Further, steel may melt slightly and warp slightly in adverse heat (Dodson,

Religious and Ethnic Diversity Paper Essay Example for Free

Religious and Ethnic Diversity Paper Essay The religious group that I have chosen is Hinduism and the ethnic/racial group that is not my own that I have chosen is Black (African Descent). I have chosen these two to explain how they are similar and how they are different. Hinduism is a religion that most people know nothing about. They are one of the world’s oldest religions as it has no beginning and precedes recorded history. Hinduism is a religion that leads the individual to personally experience the truth within themselves and reach full consciousness where man and God are one. After reading I have found that Hinduism differs from other religious groups because they believe in reincarnation whereas the other religious groups believe that once a person dies they either will go to heaven or hell depending on how they were when they were alive. The experience of Hinduism and others that do not share their beliefs or practices is criticism. They are often judged and criticized because they fail to distinguish between revelations. This religious group has contributed to American culture because they don’t believe in violence. They also contributed to the International Society for Krishna Consciousness. Some examples of prejudice and discrimination against Hinduism would be the Caste system or saying that they all burn their wives as well as discriminate against India where most come from. After reading the information to write this paper I must say it has helped me to understand this religion because I didn’t know that they were so much criticized. From what I read it seems like a very peaceful religion. They believe in reincarnation which I believe is possible, I mean, â€Å"why does a person have to go to heaven or hell†? I think that their religion is against violence which we definitely could have less of. The racial group that I have chosen was Black of African descent. This group differs from others because they have gone through so much over the years. They have experienced slavery which many other religions haven’t as they more so experienced discrimination. Blacks have not had such a great experience with other races because of always being mistreated because of their color. I think that they were brought over for slavery and still experience this even now these days from certain types of other races. Blacks have contributed to American culture though business and through entertainment. Most of the entertainment business is African American as well as sports and now we even have a black president. All very good contributions to American culture. Some examples of discrimination would be things like unequal pay for blacks performing the same work as whites, isolating blacks to only work in certain areas or specific locations, routinely denying black’s promotions, laying off blacks while whites keep their jobs and take on theirs as well. All of these are prime examples of discrimination that blacks go through in the United States. The sources of this discrimination would be whites or other races that were not black. Most of the cases that I read about though were whites still discriminating against black even after all the movements to move past racism. What I learned about this racial group is that even after all these years they are still faced with discrimination more than other racial groups. I can’t really say that I have learned any more than I already knew just because I see this happen regularly. I have a black/Cuban fiance and I have seen jobs do these things to him and now we have 2 boys that are mixed with white and black and have seen them faced with discrimination just because of the color of their skin. In conclusion, I believe that Hinduism and Black (African descent) both experience similar discrimination if the fact that they are perceived by first impressions and by the color of their skin. They are not given the luxury of being spoken with or getting to know them without the preconceived notion of their skin color. Both Hinduism and Blacks contribute to American culture business wise and yet many fail to know that. I can’t really say they are different because these two groups both experience prejudice and discrimination quite often. They are both groups of people that have done nothing wrong and just want to be a part of the world. References Nine Beliefs of Hinduism. (2013). Retrieved from http://www. himalayanacademy. com/readlearn/basics/nine-beliefs Hinduism and the Encounter with Other Faiths. (2008). Retrieved from http://www. worlddialogue. org/content. php? id=59 The Black Factor. (n. d. ). Retrieved from http://theblackfactor. blogspot. com/2008/03/examples-of-discrimination-harassment. html.

Plato and Aristotle Theory of State Comparison

Plato and Aristotle Theory of State Comparison Compare and contrast Plato’s and Aristotle’s accounts of the ideal ‘polis’ or state. Introduction Plato (student of Socrates) and Aristotle (student of Plato); two of the most persuasive rationalists of the splendid time of Greek era; Plato and Aristotle have colossally helped political rationale, aside distinctive domains. This essay will evaluate two diverse methodologies whilst discussing the reasons of comprehension, disagreement and epistemology itself; as regards the cures on the ideal state by both these Socratic academics. A State or polis is more than a legislature that is clear, governments change, but a state perseveres. A state is the method for guideline over a characterized or sovereign domain. It is made up by an official, an administration, courts and different foundations. (https://www.globalpolicy.org/nations-a-states/what-is-a-state.html). Plato was the first Greek scholar to attempt a watchful, deliberate investigation on systematic analysis in political thought. This essay will furthermore examine Socrates impact on Plato. It then takes a gander at Platos the Republic, and considers his model of a perfect constitution. It then concludes with a talk of Aristotles mind boggling and modern examination of political constitutions (Plato to Nato page 18) The ideal state The Ideal simply implies to an origination of something in its total flawlessness (perfection) Thusly, an immaculate state must be an express that is concentrated around a consummated standard. (http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ideal). A State is more than a legislature; that is clear. Governments change, however states persevere. A state is the method for guideline over a characterized or sovereign domain. It is made up by an official, an administration, courts and different foundations. (https://www.globalpolicy.org/nations-a-states/what-is-a-state.html). In their agreement and dis-agreement both Plato and Aristotle recommended what the idealised states should be based upon and how they ought to be. For Plato and Aristotle, the end of the state is good; as value (Justice) is the premises for the ideal state. Rulers= wisdom+ rational, Soldiers= Courage+ spirited, Artisans= Temperance+ Appetitive. The Ideal state ruled by the philosopher was made conceivable through an extravagant and thorough plan of instruction. The hypothesis of philosopher ruler was the linchpin of Plato’s Ideal state. It was gotten from the conviction that the scholar had the knowledge, judgment and training to lead. Decision like any other undertakings required abilities and capabilities. And its point was the general prosperity of all. A good ruler was one who saved the lives of his subjects, as well as changed them as people. A Philosopher is an ideal person to rule, for he wouldnt be enthused about getting wealth for amplification toward oneself. Socrates characterized a philosopher as one who cherished astuteness, had a passion for learning and was dependably and enthusiastic to learn. Furthermore Socrates emphasised on philosophers being individuals who cherished the truth. (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT : PLATO TO MARX, By SUBRATA MUKHERJEE, SUSHILA RAMASWAMY) A philosopher by his grasp of the idea of good was best qualified to rule, implying that knowledge could be obtained only by a select few who had the leisure and the material comforts. Plato shared the general Greek perception of that leisure was essential for the pursuit of wisdom. A philosopher would be able to administer Justice and Act for the good of the community. He would have a good character, a calm disposition and a strong mind. He would have the qualities of a ruler namely truthfulness high mind-ness, discipline and courage. Plato imparted the general Greek impression of that leisure was key for the quest for wisdom. Philosophers would have the capacity to control Justice and Act for the benefit of the community; would have a decent character, a cool manner and a solid personality. A Philosophers would also have characteristics of a ruler to be specific truthfulness high personality ness, order and boldness. (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT: PLATO TO MARX, By SUBRATA MUKHERJEE, SUSHILA RAMASWAMY Socrates analysed the genesis of states and urban communities, and called attention to that they emerged out of two reasons. The primary was common need and the second the distinctions in aptitudes of people was not independent and depend ended on others for subsistence. Plato made two imperative focuses. The principal was that each individual was a useful unit, allotted a specific errand with obvious commitments and privileges, which one was required to perform determinedly and carefully. It likewise underlined the way that nobody was destined to render a particular capacity. Secondly society was imagined as an issue, precise entire, in light of the distinguishment of individual gifts and contributions. . (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT: PLATO TO MARX, By SUBRATA MUKHERJEE, SUSHILA RAMASWAMY Education for Plato was intended to make the best possible environment for the sustaining and advancement of the human soul. In the Republic Plato dedicated more prominent space and attention to group of wives than to property. Since he was dismayed by the optional position ladies held inside the family, restricted to perform house hold errands. The dispassionate plan was focused around the premises that ladies and men were indistinguishable in regular enrichments and workforces. Having illustrated the points of interest of the Ideal state Plato inspected four different sorts of regimes. Timocracy- adoration for triumph and respect, aspiration and enthusiasm in war and cash making, Oligarchy- a state led by the affluent few, people giving more thoughtfulness regarding riches and cash making and less to uprightness, Democracy- was portrayed by permit, inefficiency, rudeness, turmoil and the majority rule man effortlessness more essentialness to his longings and hungers, no request or limitations and Tyranny- is described by the absence of sympathy toward ones subjects and a longing to get each of the one wishes. Each of these regimes had a comparing kind of individual. The inevitable destiny of every single regime was oppression. Despite the fact that Plato portrayed how regimes declined into oppression, he didnt clarify how they could recuperate from oppression. (Democracy As the Political Empowerment of the People: The Betrayal of an Ideal edited by Majid Behrouzi) The impact of Plato on Aristotle was significant and pervasive, Aristotle imparted to Plato on many different perspectives articulated in the Republic, to be specific the hierarchy of individual inclination, Justice as an issue or request among parts, and the certainty of social classes. Yet he likewise separated from his teacher many different ways, specifically on the Ideal state, the measurement of morals and the reasons for revolution. Aristotles standards of the golden mean, support of mixed constitutions, confidence in the white collar class (middle class) lead as being best for guaranteeing a steady and persevering government, and the need of property to guarantee independence and satisfy the sense of possessiveness in the person. Aristotle was censorious of the plan of the Ideal state that Plato illustrated in the Republic. He fought that Platos accentuation on solidarity rather than concordance inside a state, would just prompt extreme regimentation and the suspension of the state as a political affiliation. (. (Democracy As the Political Empowerment of the People: The Betrayal of an Ideal edited by Majid Behrouzi) Aristotle does not by any means concur with Platos evaluation of regimes in the Republic. His Politics is to a great extent a rejoinder of the contentions made in the Republic. Aristotle characterizes three different regimes Kingship, Aristocracy and Polity. These regimes have degenerate of regimes relating. Tyranny, Oligarchy and Democracy. Kingship for Aristotle it is the most wanted regime however because of its capacity to rapidly transform into oppression it is not the best conceivable regime. Kingship is basic, it is the principle by one individual who is best. In the Kingship there is stand out citizen and that is the King himself. This can be contrasted in some way with Platos dialog of the Philosopher King, despite the fact that the King in such an regime require not so much be a Philosopher however not a Tyrant either. Aristocracy is characterised as the same regime for both Plato and Aristotle, the principle by the prudent. Polity is characterised by Aristotle as a mix between Oligarchy and Democracy. Depending upon the rulers it can either be all the more intensely oligarchic or all the more vigorously Democratic. The distinction between the two being that an Oligarchic Polity would be led by a couple of chosen well off people, while the Democratic Polity would be ruled by the individuals. This regime is the thing that Aristotle calls the best conceivable regime on the grounds that it includes the standard by the ordinary class. The ordinary class frequently makes up the above all occupants in a city and in this way the administration which takes into consideration them to be subjects considers the most support in the operation of the city. (. (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT: PLATO TO MARX, By SUBRATA MUKHERJEE, SUSHILA RAMASWAMY) Platos political thought has been compressed as the tenet of the best man – the savant ruler who alone knows the perfect benchmarks for the state. Additionally, governing is an expertise; as the best man must be prepared to run the show. Decision is additionally a perfect. Aristotles decision belief system has been abridged as the guideline of the best laws – a decently requested constitution which involves great legislation. For him, albeit decision is an aptitude and a perfect also; it is likewise a science (despite the fact that Aristotle comprehends governmental issues as a regulating or prescriptive train as opposed to as an absolutely observational or spellbinding request). Plato proposes the abolishment of the family in his socialism, as he says the guardian and the auxiliaries might have no wife of their own, yet in as something to be shared. Kids ought to be differentiated from their guardians during childbirth and raised by the state. Subsequently, there will be more solidarity and less disharmonies. Aristotle differs and maintained that the family is the bedrock of the state and crucial society secured as per the law of nature to give mans every day needs. He scorned socialism, in his words everybody is slanted to disregard something which he anticipates that an alternate will satisfy; as in families numerous chaperons are frequently less helpful than a couple. Democracy- A legislature in which the individuals as entire or a piece of the individuals have sovereign force (regularly through chosen delegates.) (ref:Political Thinkers, David Boucher and Paul Kelly) (Democracy)Majority rules system is considered to be the best accomplishment form of government in aged Athens. It is the only form of government considered to be holding substantial political structures. It can be by large seen to be upheld in today’s society. â€Å"The 2011 Arab Spring activism in Egypt and Tunisia enlivened Syrian dissidents to take to the avenues in shows against Assads regime. Syrians voiced their misery with the stagnant political procedure and were advocates for democratic reformations†. (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/syrian-civil-war/story?id=20112311) Platos democracy- In Greek Democracy is Demos Kratos; Demos signifying individuals and kratos signifying guideline joined together to mean ruled by the people (ref: A reader by R.Blaug and J.Schwarzmontel 2000) , majority rules system was an arrangement of government wherein the individuals chose their rulers; on account of Athens, it was, pretty much, a direct democracy rule system, where all male nationals voted in a gathering and chose by dominant part administer (chosen authorities were picked by assignments, e.g. Council, Committee, president, magistrates, courts etc) Both Plato and Aristotle saw majority rule government (Democracy) as the most noticeably awful manifestation of government. For Plato, majority rules system was the most exceedingly bad of all legitimate governments and the best of all untamed ones. (The republic Plato). Aristotle’s main criticism of democracy was that there was no one type of democracy, rather they were multiple. The reason behind these mul tiple democracies for Aristotle was due to a wide difference between citizens, e.g. there were crafts men, labourers, farmers etc. All these formed a different combination of the institution that made them democratic. (The politics Aristotle) Plato and Aristotle recommended that the perfect state be little in size, keeping in mind the end goal to achieve flawlessness simpler. The Greek state (Athens) was generally little. Additionally, it happened that the entire of Greece was partitioned into little city states, of which each one had their independent government and decision framework. In spite of the fact that, Plato and Aristotle concede to the idea of a perfect state, in any case they differ on deeper issues. Plato characterized the way of things in hypothetical terms through mysticism, rather than genuine terms (phenomena and ideal). Hence by looking to the higher structures he meant to clarify the capacity of existing information and understandings in the quest for unquestionably reality. However Aristotle was more concerned with the genuine physical gimmicks of nature, generally natural Sciences. Through their diverse methodologies in regards to the way of man, both Plato and Aristotle tried to clarify the relation ship between the individual and society, besides the necessity of government to maintain request and security. Platos perfect city-state, which he alludes to in his dialog in the Republic as the kallipolis, and Aristotles idea of the perfect relationship between the social request and government in a real city state are differentiating not with respect to the end and reason which they looked to satisfy the telos; yet rather over the proposed path in which they tried to meet that telos. . ( ref:HUTCHINSON, D. S. â€Å"Ethics† in The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. ed) use the uws library eletrone to reference )

Dystopia in Aldous Huxleys Brave New World :: Brave New World

Dystopia in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World It's hard to imagine yet somehow so extremely close to us is the possibility of a world of ideal perfection where there is no room or acceptance of individuality. Yet, as we strive towards the growth of technology and improvement of our daily living we come closer to closing the gap between the freedom of emotions, self understanding, and of speech and the devastation of a dystopia. A utopia, or perfect world, gone awry is displayed in Aldous Huxley's provocative novel Brave New World. Dystopia is drawn on "political and emotional events, anchoring its vision of a nightmarish future in contemporary fears of totalitarian ideology and uncontrolled advances in technology and science" (Baker 22). It is the situation that costs a piece of an unhealthy environment for human beings, is the theme of the novel. The dystopian setting is brought about by technology and by higher authorities. As technology increases, the use for human beings in the work force decreases leaving an overwhelming amount of depression among humans. Therefore, a way to continue the production of technological findings is by bringing up humans from day one to accept their unhappiness as normal. By "breeding" human beings to accept the fact that they are born to do a specific group. Higher authorities know the illimination of humans' emotions is useful to stabilize what they think to be a utopian society. Huxley portrays a "perfect dystopia" where scientists "breed people to order" in a specific class (Baker 2). The purpose of this paper is to shows that Aldous Huxley clearly introduces a river of cases and incidences, which adds to the dystopia in his science fiction novel Brave New World. Aldous Huxley was born on July 26, 1894 in England into a family of novelists and scientists. Leonard Huxley, Aldous's father, was an essayist and an editor who also was a respected, leading biologist in the time of Darwinism. Both his brother and half-brother worked in the science field. Huxley received an extensive training in both medicine and in the arts and sciences. Huxley was described by V.S. Pritchett as "that rare being-the prodigy, the educable young man, the peremial asker of unusual questions" (Introduction to Aldous Huxley 1). Huxley wrote a series of novels and essays as his career progressed. Two of his best known novels are Brave New World and Island. These two novels depict a world of dystopia. In Brave New World it's author "shifts his mildly satiric observations of a limited group of people to a broader and more ironic satire of a utopian society" (Introduction to Aldous Huxley

Islamic Political Thought Essay

The division of spiritual and temporal in Christianity has taken a long time to be enacted into the political theory of the occidental mind. There is a long history of church rule behind today’s secular political thinking. Which recognizes religion as of no significance in the eye of the state. They have taken the sovereignty from God and put it into the hands of the people. In doing so they have declared collective human conscience as their guide and have rejected all sorts of scriptures of divine nature. This is leading these societies to moral ruin. Approval of homosexuality as a legal practice by the legislatures of some western countries is an indication of the moral collapse that awaits them. Although Islam has no division of spirit and mundane but still does not support theocracy or any other form of autocratic rule. It has taken a middle course, which can best be explained by the word â€Å"autonomous†. Giving the absolute power and responsibility of guidance in the hands of God, Islam lets the, Muslims to exercise unlimited sovereignty within the limits of Quran and Sunnah. Introduction This topic seemingly look very simple and the one which can have a straightforward answer. But actually it required a great insight into the historical and the political perspective of Islamic world at large. This proposition can be tackled at a number of levels. One scheme of addressing this question could be to go to the theological injunctions, that is, to argue from Quran and Hadith. The second approach could be of digging into the history and bringing out the relevant examples. There is yet another way of going through this riddle and that is to examine the evolution of political ideology in the world of Islam and comparing it with the political evolution of the other nations or rest of the world. We may adopt any of the above methodology. But in order to get a better view of things and comprehensive answer to this question. We analyze it at all the three above-mentioned levels. This will certainly render us a better understanding of not only this question but also of many other aspects of related political problems confronting the modern Muslim societies. Before beginning with our discussion it is useful that we first determine what sovereignty is? Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary describes sovereignty as: the highest power or fully independent and self-governing. Similarly Webster’s dictionary gives the following meanings to this word: â€Å"supreme leader or the one who exercise authority in a limited sphere†. Quranic Interpretation As for as simplest mind, which goes through the Quranic text, it cannot ignore the fact that the God, that is Allah, is omnipotent, all powerful and all governing. This is the first and the last impression, which Quran leaves on any mind, no matter how naive it may be. Contrary to many doctrines, Quran declares Allah to be the sole authority on every thing that is present not only in this world but the whole of the universe. Many Quranic verses can be quoted in this context. Blessed is the Lord who holds control over all and is Omnipotent. † (Al-mulk) And again: â€Å"Exalted is the One who controls every thing and to Him you shall resurrect. † (Ya-seen) This makes very cleat that every thing lies with Allah. It flows from thence unto His creatures. Same is the case with authority and sovereignty. Allah has send man on this earth as his vicegerent. Allah has given man sovereignty to reign on this world. As Quran says, â€Å"(remember) When your Lord said to angels that indeed I shall appoint a vicegerent on Earth. † (Al-baqarah) Thus, man rules earth on the behalf of his Lord. Therefore he can exercise sovereignty with in certain limits, prescribed by Allah. Once established that sovereignty is a reign were man has been given access. We find out whether men have been given some right to make decisions for themselves or not. Is a ruler selected by Allah and imposed on men or they are encouraged to exercise their sovereign right by some collective means? Now this is an arguable question. Some section may say that a king or some sort of ruler, imposed on the society by one way or the other, has the right to exercise the sovereignty that Allah has bestowed upon men. And we also find such a precedent in the Quran, from the story of Talloot and Jalloot in sura al-baqarah we come to know that kings were imposed on men without their will and consultation, what so ever. One may cite this example from the Holy book to give weight to his argument. But one thing must be kept in minds of the people that it was the practice of Allah for the people of Israel, usually referred to as Banu-Isreal in the Quran. Who were in a stage of evolution that was to culminate at the advent of the last Prophet Muhammad (P.B. U. H)? For us i. e. the ummah of the last prophet, this rule has changed. And the new scheme under which the sovereignty has to be exercised is given in the following verse: â€Å"And they conduct their affairs with mutual consultation. † (Shura) Thus we see that Quran encourages its followers to adopt a scheme of exercising their sovereignty over themselves by a way, which hinges itself over some system of broader consultation. Of the two views, latter is the one, which seems to be accurate and closer to the rationale thinking. From the above discussion, we have reached a conclusion that Quran does recognize the sovereignty of Muslim citizen in an Islamic state and they have to device such a methodology or system, which makes it convenient for them to achieve broader consultation. Quran, similarly, rejects a single person’s claim to sovereignty and authority. Who so ever becomes a ruler of a muslim state must take the views of the society while making decisions? Now the Quran does not let loose Muslims after giving them right to sovereignty. There are a number of responsibilities that the Quran puts on their shoulders. And Quran, in its own brief but effective manner, puts them as: â€Å"Those to whom we give power, must establish the system of prayers and charity and they ask the people to do good and forbid from doing evil. † Guidance from Sunnah Sunnah i. e. Prophet’s life and actions is the biggest source after the Holy (Quran). There fore, we refer our self to this source. As the Quran says, â€Å"Consult Allah and the Prophet in a matter of discord. † At another place it is mentioned: â€Å"Surely there is the best guidance for you in the life of the prophet. † We see that the early part of the Prophet hood of Prophet Muhammad (P.B. U. H) does not give us any clue of the relation of citizens and state. It is only the latter part of his Prophet hood i. e. Medina period, in which he established a city state that we find some form or structure of a government. Now we can have any debate on the question of citizen’s sovereignty in the eye of Islam basing our investigations on this period of Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H)’s life. It has become convenient, for at the very beginning of Medina period there is a record of a political agreement between all the cross-sections of population of Medina. This political document in itself, otherwise, is a very important and valuable document. It gives an insight into the political situation of the Muslims in particular and Medina and it’s surrounding in general. Coming back to the question we are confronted with. We investigate this document to find if it sheds any light on this particular question. The first clause, which defines the parties to the treaty, adequately addresses the sovereignty of the citizens. 1. This is the treaty between the Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H), Aus and Khazraj (the helpers) and Jews of Medina and its surroundings. . Above-mentioned parties would be one group for the defense of Medina. 3. Every body is independent to practice ones religion. 4. Disputes among Jews would be settled according to their laws. It was an unprecedented treaty in respect of its very liberal approach towards communities of other religions. The point, which is very important for our thesis, is that everybody in Medina was treated as an equal party in this treaty. This was going to be the future constitution of that state for the rest of the life of the Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H). Although the Jews broke this accord and had to pay its price. We do not talk about Jews as is mentioned above that they were left to their own laws. But the Divine laws governed Muslims. Which were revealed to the Prophet (P. B. U. H. ) from time to time. Thus we see that Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H) in that state was the sole source of legislation. All the laws came from him. Many people misunderstand this phenomenon and they equate this authority of making laws by the Prophet Muhammad (P. BU. H) (that were revealed) as a precedent for authoritarian government by a single man. No, this approach is essentially flawed and contrary to the practice of the Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H). If we examine his political life and circumstances prevalent at that time more carefully and keenly. Then we get to a conclusion rather different from the misunderstanding that has been indicated above. As we know that Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H) was sent to a people who were totally ignorant, had never experienced any form of collective government and, therefore did not have laws and legislations. Further more, Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H)’s, messaged was meant for all times to come. Thus Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H) was sent to such a neighborhood where he could construct a model beginning from scratch and having no influence of any previous system whatsoever. Now it was Prophet Muhammad’s (P. B. U. H) job to introduce to them a system of laws and governance based on the divine guidance, and through them he was to demonstrate it to all people for all times to come. Laws were of course revealed and Muslims had and have to obey them as such. But when it comes to governance, we have ample examples to quote; Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H) mostly used the method of consultation. And this is what the message is that after the discontinuation of revelation, Muslims have to run their affairs in the light of revealed guidance by mutual consultation. To quote few examples from Prophet Muhammad’s (P. B. U. H) life, in order to support the notion that citizens of an Islamic state do have some rights to exercise sovereignty over themselves, we refer to the following instances from the Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H) life: 1. As mentioned previously, in the very beginning of political history of the state of Medina general public i. e. Muslims were made an equal part in the matters of the governance. Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H) did not make himself the sole representative of the whole Muslim community. 2. Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H) appointed twelve representatives (Naqeebs) among the Ansar to represent them. 3. Before the battle of Badr Prophet Muhammad (P. B. U. H) consulted Muhajreen as well as Ansar. 4. In the battlefield of Badr, the camping place of the army was selected on the advice of Habbad-bin-Munzir. 5. At the time of Uhad , Prophet Muhammad’s (P. B. U. H) own opinion was to fight within the city but the general opinion was to fight outside the city, and that was followed. 6. In the battle of Ahzaab, the strategy of digging a trench for the defense of Medina was again an idea presented by Salman. 7. The method of calling the faithful to the prayer was again a matter sort out by mutual consultation. Hence at end of this chapter we conclude that Prophet Muhammad’s (P. B. U. H) life adequately provides us the evidence that in an Islamic state the power to rule and govern lies with the citizens and not with a single person or family or some creed. Rather it is the right of the people to govern themselves as they please, but of course not violating the Quranic limits set upon them. Those to whom we give power, must establish the system of prayers and charity and they ask the people to do good and forbid from doing evil. † Islamic History and Muslim Scholars We have come out of an academic discussion. Now we shall be analyzing historical events and political realities. As we enter into a new phase of discussion. It will be very useful that we revise and redefine the question we are confronted with. So when we ask this that â€Å"are people sovereign in Islam? † What do we actually mean to imply? What are the other questions, which confront us when we say, â€Å"yes people are sovereign†? Having proved that sole source of power and strength is the Allah Almighty; do we mean to say, that Allah and His angels are physically involved in the governance of a state? Of course not, is the obvious answer. It is the men themselves who shall be arranging for any type of government. After placing theoretically all powers in Allah, when sovereignty is given to citizens it means following things. 1. Any government that is formed will be only due to the consensus of the majority of people. 2. Whenever there is some decision to be made, again it will be referred to people. Whatever a government or the rulers do is accountable to public. 4. As the government or state has functional powers, thus checks and balances on it to safeguard people against any sort of tyranny or exploitation. Now we shall examine different types of governments in Islamic history on the basis of these above points. To begin with, we first analyze first four guided caliphs. Abu Bakr (R. A) was made caliphs and presented him in front of public. His first address is very suitable example. It encompasses almost all the above four points. He said: â€Å"O people! I have been made caliph against my will.

Stonewall Riots of 1969

Introduction The stonewall riots of 1969 happened consecutively for 3 days, it all started on June 27th in Greenwich Village, New York at the Stonewall Inn. During the 1960’s it was common for the police to raid gay bars, and when this would happen the gays and lesbians would try to sneak out the back door. The police would arrest the patrons and drag them off to jail, their names were written down and published in the newspaper by the next day and as a result they would be fired from their jobs. â€Å"The 1960s was a time of revolution.The Civil Rights Movement was in full swing and people took to the streets to protest the war in Vietnam. It was only a matter of time before gays and lesbians stood up for their rights as well. †(A history of Gay and Lesbian Pride) June is now the month known as Gay Pride month, a time when all gays and lesbians prance and parade to celebrate. Setting/Background Living in the 1960’s as a gay and or lesbian was very difficult in f act the only way to be safe was to be â€Å"in the closet†, not openly gay to the public.Police took it up as their duty to arrest gay patrons who were seen kissing each other, dancing with one another, or even holding hands with one another. â€Å"Generally just being present was enough in their minds to warrant an arrest. Of course when this appeared in the newspaper they were tabbed as having committed a Crime against nature. †(The history and impact of the Stonewall Riots) Issues Involved/Causes During the 1950’s – 1990’s gay couples were not allowed to touch or dance with one another; it was also illegal for women to dress up in men’s clothing and men to dress in women’s clothing.If three known homosexuals were sitting at a table together then it would be illegal to serve an alcoholic beverage to them. â€Å"If the gay’s didn’t comply with the laws then they were faced with a fine, a night in jail, and the next mor ning they would have their names printed the daily newspapers and have a record under criminal activity†. (The history and impact of the Stonewall Riots) Event On June 27th police raided a gay bar in Greenwich, New York at the Stonewall Inn.Police demanded identification papers from costumers, they escorted them outside on to the sidewalks were they were pushed off and others were put into a paddy-wagon. That’s when some of the lesbians and gays started to fight back. They Chanted â€Å"Gay Power† all while throwing bottles and rocks at the police. â€Å"Riot veteran and gay rights activist Craig Rodwell says: â€Å"A number of incidents were happening simultaneously. There was no one thing that happened or one person, there was just†¦ a flash of group, of mass anger. (The stonewall riots-1969) Crowds soon began to grow outside the Stonewall Inn. Every time the police would have the crowd spilt up it would just start again right behind them and again they would start to chant. Thirteen arrest had been made on the first night of the riot many of the protesters were singled out and beaten and then later were arrested. With about two thousand protesters and only about four hundred police officers, the tactical patrol force was called in to disperse the riots but with a failed attempt the riot continued on.Outcome/Effects/Aftermath Effects of the Stonewall Riots were that the gay community in new York united in the fight against discrimination and June became known as a gay month to celebrate their pride in homosexuality. The gay liberation front was organized. Gay people learned to take a stand for themselves and to fight back. Reflection Though gay issues are still a problem today in America, the Stonewall Riots was the first step toward uniting the gay community to start taking a stand for what they believe is right.I believe that if it wasn’t for the Stonewall Riots then life for gays and lesbians would still be the same as it was then. It was the Stonewall Riot that led to gay liberations and for the gay community to start working together to make life easier for them. I don’t believe that the police should have gone as far as they did with raiding gay bars, but it was there ridings that led up to the Stonewall Riot so actually I’m glad that they did that otherwise the gay liberation front may have never been formed.

Free Essays on Effects Of Television On Children

What has happened to humankind today? Over and over again it seems like everywhere one looks, it’s presence known. It is observant in the streets, back alleys, school, even at home, last but not least television a major source of violence. Appearing in living rooms of homes across the world sits a channel for violence that often goes overlooked. It is the television, and the children who watch it that are pulled into its realistic world of violent scenes with sometimes shocking results. Much investigation has gone into showing why children are so fascinated by this big glowing box and the action that takes place within it. Studies show that television is certainly a major cause of violent behavior in children. The research proves time and time again that rage and television viewing work hand in hand. The truth concerning television violence and children has been revealed. A few are attempting to battle this setback. Others are closing their eyes to it, hoping it will go away. Still others do not even appear to worry. However, the details are undeniable. The studies have been carried out and the outcome leads to one conclusion: Television violence causes children to be violent and the end product can be life-long. The information cannot be unnoticed. Violent television viewing does affect children. The effects have been seen in a number of cases. In New York, a 16-year-old boy broke into a cellar; when the police caught him and asked him why he was wearing gloves he replied that he had learned to do so, so he would not leave fingerprints and that he discovered this on television. In Alabama, a nine-year-old boy received a bad report card from his teacher. He suggested sending the teacher poisoned candy as revenge as he had seen on television the night before. In Califo rnia, a seven-year-old boy sprinkled ground-up glass into the lamb stew the family was to eat for dinner; when asked why he did it he replied that ... Free Essays on Effects Of Television On Children Free Essays on Effects Of Television On Children What has happened to humankind today? Over and over again it seems like everywhere one looks, it’s presence known. It is observant in the streets, back alleys, school, even at home, last but not least television a major source of violence. Appearing in living rooms of homes across the world sits a channel for violence that often goes overlooked. It is the television, and the children who watch it that are pulled into its realistic world of violent scenes with sometimes shocking results. Much investigation has gone into showing why children are so fascinated by this big glowing box and the action that takes place within it. Studies show that television is certainly a major cause of violent behavior in children. The research proves time and time again that rage and television viewing work hand in hand. The truth concerning television violence and children has been revealed. A few are attempting to battle this setback. Others are closing their eyes to it, hoping it will go away. Still others do not even appear to worry. However, the details are undeniable. The studies have been carried out and the outcome leads to one conclusion: Television violence causes children to be violent and the end product can be life-long. The information cannot be unnoticed. Violent television viewing does affect children. The effects have been seen in a number of cases. In New York, a 16-year-old boy broke into a cellar; when the police caught him and asked him why he was wearing gloves he replied that he had learned to do so, so he would not leave fingerprints and that he discovered this on television. In Alabama, a nine-year-old boy received a bad report card from his teacher. He suggested sending the teacher poisoned candy as revenge as he had seen on television the night before. In Califo rnia, a seven-year-old boy sprinkled ground-up glass into the lamb stew the family was to eat for dinner; when asked why he did it he replied that ...